| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
698
   |
Posted - 2015.07.08 15:15:59 -
[1] - Quote
Why do you keep making nullbears safer? You already made it so they can leave wormholes unspawned, now you decrease the number alltogether. Are wormholers killing too many ratting carriers? Is the CSM nullbloc too strong?
SSC Brokering Service
|
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
698
|
Posted - 2015.07.08 15:46:12 -
[2] - Quote
Gideon Enderas wrote:Why the heavy handed nerf to wormholes? I can understand the spawn rate reductions, but the 16 hour lifetime is absolutely stupid. It makes perfect sense: it equals to less time when nullsec krabs need to stay docked. I'm sure it was supported by all CSMs.
SSC Brokering Service
|
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
698
|
Posted - 2015.07.08 15:52:47 -
[3] - Quote
Querns wrote:Gideon Enderas wrote:Why the heavy handed nerf to wormholes? I can understand the spawn rate reductions, but the 16 hour lifetime is absolutely stupid. Seems like a decent change to me -- it should allow PVPers based in wormhole space to hit a larger breadth of targets without having to resort to as much laborious hole-rolling. I'm sorry, but it will result in exactly the opposite - smaller amount of viable nullsec holes (out of which we hunt) in any given chain. Hence more rolling to get some non-****, non-EOL hole. The breadth of targets will diminish, time time window will diminish -> less targets, more rolling, safer nullsec.
SSC Brokering Service
|
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
699
|
Posted - 2015.07.08 16:11:12 -
[4] - Quote
Querns wrote:Sounds like they are trying to nerf the chain itself. I doubt you'll get much traction on getting this reversed, no matter how much you crow about a "safer nullsec." I agree 100%, especially since safer nullsec (in general, not just from us) seems to be at least one of the goals and theres noone on CSM to push against a nerf like this.
SSC Brokering Service
|
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
699
|
Posted - 2015.07.08 16:22:22 -
[5] - Quote
Querns wrote:Axloth Okiah wrote:Querns wrote:Sounds like they are trying to nerf the chain itself. I doubt you'll get much traction on getting this reversed, no matter how much you crow about a "safer nullsec." I agree 100%, especially since safer nullsec (in general, not just from us) seems to be at least one of the goals and theres noone on CSM to push against a nerf like this. It's not a goal. A sentiment does not automatically become rooted in deliberate intent if you feel strongly enough about it.
devblog wrote:We are beginning with a set of tweaks to Nullsec wormhole connections in Aegis, intended to ease some of the concerns around WH power projection without negatively impacting wormhole residents or eliminating the ability of Nullsec entities to roam through wormholes.
It seems like the intent is to curb power projection through wormholes into nullsec. This imho means making it safer for the locals, because their would be killers have much harder time (or much lower probability) getting there to do the killing.
If this is not the deliberate intent of the change, then I wonder why they state it in the devblog and what the real intent is.
SSC Brokering Service
|
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
706
|
Posted - 2015.07.08 18:48:52 -
[6] - Quote
Saisin wrote:CCP has increased the ratio of WHNull Sec exit on July 4th, from what the patch notes are saying source?
SSC Brokering Service
|
| |
|